Chamisa Dismisses ‘Sellout’ Claims Amid Debate Over Constitutional Amendment Bill

HARARE – Former Citizens Coalition for Change (CCC) leader Nelson Chamisa has dismissed allegations that he has “sold out the struggle for democracy,” describing the claims as part of a coordinated propaganda campaign. The accusations, largely from sections of the opposition and civic activists, stem from Chamisa’s perceived silence and limited public engagement on the controversial Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment Bill No. 3 currently before Parliament.

In a brief but pointed statement, Chamisa rejected the allegations, saying they were politically motivated and driven by misinformation.

“Disturbing to note a propaganda campaign of fake news, fabricated falsehoods and contrived lies being sponsored by the oppressors,” he said.

He reiterated his stance that Zimbabwe is facing a broader governance and constitutional crisis.

“The will of the citizens must be restored and respected. Zimbabweans must unite against the disputed government and amendments,” Chamisa added.

The proposed constitutional changes have sparked widespread debate across Zimbabwe’s political and legal landscape. The Bill reportedly seeks to:

• Extend presidential and parliamentary terms from five to seven years

• Introduce an indirect system of electing the President through Members of Parliament

Critics argue that such changes could significantly alter the country’s democratic framework.

Constitutional experts and opposition figures have raised concerns that the proposed amendments may require a national referendum under Section 328 of the Constitution, particularly where fundamental governance structures are affected. Harare-based constitutional lawyer Advocate Thabani Mpofu said public consultation is critical.

“Any amendment that affects the structure of governance or the electoral system must be subjected to the will of the people through a referendum,” he said.

However, the government and the ruling ZANU PF party maintain that a referendum is not legally required, arguing that the amendments can be enacted through Parliament.

Officials insist the legislative process currently underway is sufficient and constitutionally sound.

Chamisa emphasised that the issue transcends political party lines, framing it as a national concern.

“This is no longer about political parties but about Zimbabwe,” he said.

The debate around Amendment No. 3 comes at a time of heightened political tension, with increasing scrutiny over constitutional reforms and their potential impact on democratic governance. Political analysts say Chamisa’s response reflects an attempt to reassert his position within the opposition while addressing concerns from his support base.

“There is pressure on opposition leaders to take a clear and visible stance on constitutional reforms. Silence can easily be interpreted as complicity,” said political analyst Rejoice Ngwenya.

As discussions continue, the proposed amendments are expected to remain a flashpoint in Zimbabwe’s political discourse, with significant implications for the country’s governance and electoral systems.

Nelson Chamisa statement