Ex Supreme Court Judge Driver Arraigned on Fraud Charges

Ex-Supreme Court judge’s driver and associate arraigned in Bulawayo over US$4,800 fraud case (image source)

Bulawayo — A former driver to a Supreme Court judge and an associate were arraigned this week in Bulawayo provincial magistrate’s court over allegations of defrauding a woman of US$4,800, prosecutors said. The accused allegedly promised to secure bail pending appeal for her incarcerated husband.

Court records identify the accused as Henry Ntini (39) and Zamani Gwizi (47), both of whom pleaded not guilty. The State alleges they falsely represented their ability to influence judicial outcomes and received money from the complainant under that pretext. Legal counsel represented both men as the matter entered the evidence-gathering phase. “The accused allegedly exploited the complainant’s vulnerability by promising a legal outcome they could not deliver,” a court official said.

Prosecutors told the court the complainant handed over the funds after being assured her husband’s bail would be secured. Investigators say the accused failed to produce the promised outcome, and subsequent inquiries revealed no legitimate legal proceedings were initiated on her behalf. The case now depends on documentary evidence, witness testimony, and bank records, which prosecutors will present as they build their file. Magistrates will assess the strength of the State’s case when ruling on bail and scheduling trial dates. Fraud in Zimbabwe carries significant penalties, particularly where premeditation or exploitation is proven.

The accused’s previous association with the judiciary has heightened public interest, prompting calls for transparency. Civil society groups and legal observers stressed the importance of due process while noting potential reputational damage to confidence in justice institutions. Analysts highlight the risks of engaging intermediaries who claim undue influence and emphasise that citizens should always seek formal legal representation.

Victim-support organisations have urged protective measures for the complainant, including confidentiality and access to legal aid. Authorities reminded the public to report fraud promptly and preserve receipts, messages, or bank transfer records that may assist investigations. The magistrate has set further hearings as the State compiles additional evidence, while the accused remain in custody pending the next appearance.

Beyond the immediate case, stakeholders say the matter underscores the need for oversight of individuals claiming influence within legal systems and public education on lawful avenues for bail and appeals. Strengthening legal aid and improving access to affordable counsel may reduce the market for unscrupulous intermediaries. As proceedings continue, observers will watch for a fair and timely adjudication that balances the rights of the accused with protection for vulnerable citizens.