The ZiG 841 Million Question: What the 2026 Arts Budget Really Means for You
- Southerton Business Times

- Jan 14
- 3 min read

In November, one number caused a stir: ZiG 841.4 million.
That is the amount Finance Minister Mthuli Ncube allocated to the Ministry of Sport, Recreation, Arts and Culture for 2026. It sounds huge. It sounds promising. It also sounds confusing if you are a poet in Plumtree, a DJ in Mutare, or a sculptor in Binga.
So, let’s be clear upfront. No, the government is not about to WhatsApp you and say, “Hi First Farai, come collect your cash.” But yes, that number matters. A lot.
Think of the budget not as money dropping from the sky, but as a map. If you know how to read it, you can see where the doors are opening and where they are quietly closing.
Under the government’s National Development Strategy 2 (NDS2), the arts now sit inside a broader priority basket called “Job Creation, Youth Entrepreneurship, Creative Industry and Culture.” That is good news, as it means the arts are officially recognised as an economic sector.
However, historically a significant portion of this ministry’s budget has gone towards sports infrastructure, including stadium construction, renovations and large capital projects. That pattern has not changed.
What has changed, and what matters, is the introduction of a clear line item for the Creative Industry. In government language, this signals formal recognition of the sector.
Equally important is what sits outside the ministry. The Ministry of Youth Empowerment received approximately ZiG 1.7 billion. This matters because most creatives are under the age of 35. Funding for creative businesses, innovation hubs, training programmes and loans is largely housed there.
Anyone making money, or attempting to make money, from art, music, fashion, film or design is effectively a youth entrepreneur, regardless of whether they embrace the label.
Government funding moves through systems rather than sentiment. For 2026, three key access points are worth watching closely.
First are provincial arts grants. Through devolution, more resources are now directed to provinces, with National Arts Council of Zimbabwe (NACZ) provincial offices expected to identify and support local talent. This shift presents opportunities for creatives outside Harare, particularly community-based dance groups, craft collectives and visual artists.
Second are community halls and youth centres. The recreation component of the budget is focused on physical spaces. Renovated community halls and revived youth centres become rehearsal venues, performance spaces and, crucially, evidence of consistent artistic activity.
Third is what can be described as the donor bridge. International donors closely track government budgets. When the state signals support for the creative economy, organisations such as the Culture Fund of Zimbabwe and EU-supported programmes often follow with grants ranging from US$1,000 to US$60,000. These programmes typically prioritise digital creativity, youth employment and cultural heritage, all of which align directly with NDS2.
Ultimately, the ZiG 841 million allocation is not a gift, but fuel. Government has filled the tank, but creatives still need an engine, a licence and a clear direction.
This requires moving from informal practice to recognised economic participation. It means being registered, compliant and visible to local NACZ offices, not only to online audiences.
The practical advice is simple. Visit your provincial National Arts Council office. Ask about the Arts Development Fund. Find out what documentation is required. Ensure your group or project formally exists. When funding begins to move in 2026, it will favour creatives who can demonstrate their role in the economy, not only their cultural relevance.
Through this column, The Creative Compass, the focus will remain on translating policy into practical steps, funding access, compliance basics, market strategies and institutional navigation. For more, readers can email the writer at mdarawengozha@gmail.com or WhatsApp +263 772 113 605.





Comments