Zimbabwe: Couple Cleared as High Court Slams ‘Improper Conduct’ in Gono Fraud Case

The High Court has cleared a Zimbabwean couple in the Gono fraud case, criticising investigators and prosecutors for “improper conduct.” (image source)

Harare — The High Court has cleared a Zimbabwean couple accused in the long-running Gono fraud case, issuing a sharp rebuke over what it described as “improper conduct” during the investigation and prosecution. The ruling has reignited debate on judicial integrity, prosecutorial standards and the importance of due process in Zimbabwe’s justice system.

The allegations involved claims that the couple had defrauded former Reserve Bank Governor Gideon Gono in a property and financial transaction. Prosecutors argued that the pair misrepresented key details and diverted funds, but the High Court found the evidence insufficient and criticised the manner in which the case had been handled. The presiding judge noted that investigators failed to follow proper procedure, relied on hearsay and ignored exculpatory evidence, warning that such conduct undermines public confidence in the justice system.

The couple said they had endured years of reputational damage and financial strain. Legal analysts described the judgment as significant, saying it reflects the judiciary’s willingness to call out lapses within investigative and prosecutorial bodies. The case drew substantial public interest due to Gono’s prominence, with observers suggesting the allegations may have carried political undertones linked to factional dynamics.

Civil society organisations welcomed the decision, arguing that it sets an important precedent for accountability and reinforces safeguards against wrongful or politically motivated prosecutions. The couple’s lawyer said they are considering civil action to recover damages for financial losses and harm to their reputation. The ruling has also prompted renewed calls for reforms within investigative agencies to ensure stronger compliance with due process.

For many Zimbabweans, the High Court’s strong language against improper conduct offers a measure of reassurance about judicial independence. The decision is expected to resonate across the legal community, encouraging closer scrutiny of investigative standards and reinforcing the principle that justice must be both done and seen to be done.