ZINASU wins High Court challenge as suspensions overturned at Midlands State University

MSU Campus Gweru

MASVINGO — The High Court in Masvingo has ruled in favour of the Zimbabwe National Students Union (ZINASU), overturning the suspension of five Midlands State University (MSU) students who were expelled for allegedly conducting an unsanctioned recruitment exercise on 25 February 2025. The court found the disciplinary measures unlawful and politically motivated, ordering the immediate lifting of suspensions for four students and suspending the expulsion of a fifth pending further proceedings.

The High Court’s judgment allows Keegan Mathe, Fanuel Gona, Nester Moyo, and Tanaka Sibanda to return to their studies with immediate effect. The expulsion of Takunda Mashasha has been suspended, enabling him to resume academic activities in January 2027.

ZINASU had challenged the disciplinary action taken by MSU after the university’s vice‑chancellor, Ngonidzashe Muzvidziwa, cited breaches of the institution’s Rules of Student Conduct and Discipline. The union argued the suspensions were unlawful and politically motivated, a position the court accepted.

In a statement posted on X (formerly Twitter), ZINASU condemned political interference in university affairs and hailed the ruling as a vindication of student rights and academic freedom. The union urged universities to respect due process and avoid punitive measures that lack a legal basis.

Legal observers say the ruling reinforces judicial oversight of university disciplinary procedures and underscores the need for transparent, fair processes when dealing with student conduct. The decision may prompt other student bodies to seek legal redress where they believe disciplinary actions are arbitrary or politically influenced.

What this means for MSU and students

• Reinstatement: Four students are immediately reinstated and may resume classes and assessments.

• Conditional return: One student, whose expulsion was suspended, will return in January 2027 under the court’s terms.

• Policy review: Universities may face pressure to review disciplinary policies and ensure compliance with constitutional protections and administrative law.

• Precedent: The case sets a legal precedent for challenging university sanctions perceived as unfair or politically charged.

The university may consider appealing the High Court decision if it believes procedural or substantive errors occurred. Meanwhile, student groups, legal advocates, and higher education stakeholders will likely monitor MSU’s response and any institutional reforms to disciplinary procedures.

ZINASU High Court victory 2026